Advertisement
Promo

Network management Toolkit in association with http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;217618582;14453422;e?http://www.citrix.com/lang/English/lp/lp_1688615.asp

Inventor celebrates 30 years of Ethernet

Paul Festa CNET News.com CNET News

Published: 21 May 2003 10:22 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

But the Internet, or the Arpanet, preceded your description of Ethernet by a few years, and the first actual implementation of Ethernet technology by even longer. So my question is, how were messages transmitted before Ethernet?
The Internet had a preceding set of protocols, an earlier generation designed for a much smaller network. It was worldwide, but had a smaller number of hosts and was not designed to be used for connecting networks. So TCP/IP greatly expanded the network space and provided for building a network of networks, lots of LANs connected by lots of WANs.

How did the Ethernet prevail over the older protocols, and the others that cropped up in the future?
The speech I'm going to give on Thursday is called "Ethernet vs. Godzilla". The idea is that Ethernet has encountered a series of competitors out trying to kill it. The number is huge. The most famous is the IBM token ring. It was among the many Godzillas and the most formidable because it was backed by the dominant monopoly in computing at the time.

How was the token ring different from Ethernet? And what were its advantages and disadvantages compared with Ethernet?
It was developed by IBM. That was its principle advantage. It was organised around the passing of a token from station to station, so computers could take turns transmitting messages. With Ethernet, any station would transmit immediately and hopefully avoid collisions. The token gave permission to transmit a message. The advantage was what they called determinism, which I considered to be a red herring.

What did they mean by it?
It meant they could guarantee that data would be delivered in a certain amount of time. Without the token, in theory, Ethernet packet transmissions could take forever. That was smaller than the probability of the Earth blowing up, but they used to throw determinism at us.

So if the token ring worked with tokens, how does Ethernet work?
Any station wishing to send a packet would form the packet in memory, then listen to the ether -- the cable or the fibre or whatever -- to see if there were already a transmission ongoing. And if there were, it would wait, deferring to the transmission ongoing, and then it would send its packet. But it was possible that more than one station would be waiting, so then you would get a collision. It would notice that there was interference on the cable, which we called collision detection. As soon as it was detected, the station would abort transmission and choose a random number and try again a few microseconds later. The second one would defer and avoid multiple collisions.

And what happened to the token ring Godzilla?
There is a lot of token ring out there, but in the last few weeks IBM announced a $100m program to tear out token rings inside of IBM and replace them with Ethernet. That's a sign that you could declare it dead. Although it's been dead for some time, that would be the final blow. And the reason that Ethernet won was that Ethernet was an open standard with many competing companies providing it.

What strikes you most about what's become of Ethernet since your memo 30 years ago?
What Ethernet is today is more than a packet format or media access algorithm -- it is a business model.

How so?
I was hoping you'd ask that. There are four business models out there today. The first is the vertical model exemplified in the 1980s by the IBM monopoly. The second, which dominates today, is the horizontal model dominated by AOL, Cisco, Intel and Microsoft. They are also monopolies, I might add. The third is the Linux/open-source business model. And the fourth is the Ethernet business model.

It's based on de jure standards with proprietary implementations of those de jure standards, and it is unlike open source in that competitors don't give their intellectual property away. The competition is fierce, but there is a market ethic that products will be interoperable. And the standard evolves rapidly based on market engagement in such a way to value the installed base. There is a heavy value placed on sustaining and maintaining the installed base. That's the Ethernet business model.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
48 out of 87 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

1 comment

  1. arpanet didn't introduce packet switching, the uk... philip overy

Related Citrix Resources

Achieving the lowest server virtualization TCO

Consolidation through server virtualization is a powerful agent for datacenter change, but...

Achieving the lowest server virtualization Total Cost of Ownership

Consolidation through server virtualization is a powerful agent for datacenter change, but...

Citrix XenDesktop: The Best Desktop Delivery System For Today's Demanding Business Needs

Whether you're considering your first virtual desktop solution or trying to salvage an existing...

Desktop Virtualization: A buyer's checklist

Desktop virtualization should do more than just move desktop management to the datacenter—its real...

Five reasons why you need Citrix Essentials for Hyper-V now

This paper explores common challenges associated with server virtualization deployments and the...

See All White Papers

Video icon

Video

On The Road Blog

Nokia halves smartphone portfolio

Nokia has reduced the number of smartphone models it intends to introduce in 2010 by half, according to reports. Quoted in an article on Reuters, the Finnish handset maker's new... More

1 comment

Can I have fries with that? (Consumer...

Licence policies of Tech company's have been for a long time both complicated and 'Dick Turpin-esque', people just click 'I agree' without reading the Agreement. I do the same, but... More

1 comment

Lenovo repurchases mobile phone arm

Lenovo has bought back the mobile phone arm that it sold to a private equity firm at the start of 2008, the company said on Friday. The manufacturer sold Lenovo Mobile to the Hony... More

Post a comment


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters