Twenty years of free software: What now?
Published: 06 Jan 2004 10:55 GMT
If you take as your goal the increased popularity of certain free software, if you seek to convince more people to use some free programs some of the time, you might think those non-free program are helpful contributions to that goal. It is hard to dispute the claim that their availability helps make GNU/Linux more popular. If the widespread use of GNU or Linux is the ultimate goal of our community, we should logically applaud all applications that run on it, whether free or not.
But if our goal is freedom, that changes everything. Users cannot be free while using a non-free program. To free the citizens of cyberspace, we have to replace those non-free programs, not accept them. They are not contributions to our community, they are temptations to settle for continuing non-freedom.
There are two common motivations to develop a free program. One is that there is no program to do the job. Unfortunately, accepting the use of a non-free program eliminates that motivation. The other is the will to be free, which motivates people to write free replacements for non-free programs. In cases like these, that motive is the only one that can do the job. Simply by using a new and unfinished free replacement, before it technically compares with the non-free model, you can help encourage the free developers to persevere until it becomes superior.
Those non-free programs are not trivial. Developing free replacements for them will be a big job; it may take years. The work may need the help of future hackers, young people today, people yet to be inspired to join the work on free software. What can we do today to help convince other people, in the future, to maintain the necessary determination and persistance to finish this work?
The most effective way to strengthen our community for the future is to spread understanding of the value of freedom -- to teach more people to recognise the moral unacceptability of non-free software. People who value freedom are, in the long term, its best and essential defence.
Copyright 2004 Richard Stallman
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article are permitted world wide without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Full Talkback thread
9 comments
-
The problem is, the majority of people are like my... Anonymous -
Biggest load of hippy babble I've ever read. Why i... Anonymous -
"Why is software different from any other manufact... Anonymous -
Where should this goal of "freedom" end?
I'm emplo... Kevin Peacock -
Free software is never free the costs are just 'di... Anonymous -
'Free' as in 'freedom', not 'beer'.
You've entirel... Anonymous -
Read Stallman's definition of 'free software' at h... Anonymous -
Anonymous said :
"'Free' in 'free software' means... Kevin Peacock -
In response to a previous poster:
"Where should th... Adrian Muraru






